Studybox Research

Studybox Research Dual Submission Studies

Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)

One integrated study supporting both 510(k) clearance and CLIA waiver.

Studybox

Dual Submission Studies

Fecal immunochemical tests detect human hemoglobin and replaced guaiac tests because they do not react with dietary heme and are more sensitive for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Most FIT 510(k)s have been cleared with a general intended use, detection of fecal occult blood as an aid in the diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal disorders, supported by agreement with a predicate FIT, while a colorectal cancer screening claim requires comparison to colonoscopy in a screening population, which is a far larger undertaking.

The specimen is the design problem. Patients sample their own stool with a probe into a buffered collection device, hemoglobin degrades over time and at warm temperatures, and the quantity sampled varies with technique. Stability studies and clear instructions carry much of the submission, and a qualitative FIT read by clinic staff or by a consumer at home adds operator and lay user questions on top of the specimen questions.

Analyte
Human hemoglobin in stool
Therapeutic area
Gastrointestinal Health
Specimens
Stool
Intended-use settings
physician office, home use, pharmacy, urgent care
Operators
Patients collect at home; non-laboratory staff in physician offices and pharmacies read qualitative devices; lay users read over-the-counter versions.
Comparator
Typically an FDA-cleared fecal immunochemical test as predicate for agreement studies; for a colorectal cancer screening claim, colonoscopy findings (cancer and advanced adenoma) as the clinical reference.

Dual Submission specifics

What Changes for This Assay on This Pathway.

  • A single study in which patient-collected stool is tested by untrained operators at waived sites and by the predicate FIT supports both components for a general detection claim.
  • Over-the-counter versions add a lay user arm with collection and reading at home and a labeling comprehension assessment.
  • Positives are sparse in general screening populations; recruitment from gastroenterology referrals and known bleeding sources is typically needed to populate the positive cell.

Endpoints the study must support

  • Positive and negative percent agreement with the predicate FIT on patient-collected stool, with 95% confidence intervals
  • For screening claims, sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia against colonoscopy
  • Hemoglobin stability in the collection device across the labeled time and temperature range
  • Lay user collection success and interpretation for home-use and self-collection claims

Enrollment realities

Driven by FIT-positive subjects, who are a small fraction of average-risk adults; recruitment from gastroenterology and referral populations supplements screening volume. Collection compliance and return-time failures are predictable losses.

How Studybox runs it

Pre-Qualified Sites, Embedded Coordinators.

Waiver evidence depends on genuine intended-use operators in genuine waived settings. Our network of 100+ pre-qualified urgent care, physician office, and point-of-care sites already runs IVD protocols, so operator recruitment and site activation don't start from zero. How we run dual submission studies →

Same assay, other pathways

Relevant FDA guidance

FAQ

Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Study Questions.

01 Who operates the fecal immunochemical test (fit) in a dual submission study?

Patients collect at home; non-laboratory staff in physician offices and pharmacies read qualitative devices; lay users read over-the-counter versions.

02 What is the comparator for a fecal immunochemical test (fit) study?

Typically an FDA-cleared fecal immunochemical test as predicate for agreement studies; for a colorectal cancer screening claim, colonoscopy findings (cancer and advanced adenoma) as the clinical reference.

03 What drives enrollment for a fecal immunochemical test (fit) study?

Driven by FIT-positive subjects, who are a small fraction of average-risk adults; recruitment from gastroenterology and referral populations supplements screening volume. Collection compliance and return-time failures are predictable losses.

Let's talk IVD research

Planning a fecal immunochemical test (fit) study?

Tell us the intended use and setting. We'll come back with a site plan, operator strategy, and a realistic activation timeline for the dual submission pathway.